1. The appointed lessons for the Twenty-Fourth Sunday after Pentecost are: Job 19:23-27a; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-5, 13-17; and Luke 20:27-38. The Psalm is Psalm 17:1-9.
2. All three of the lessons for this week share several common themes:
- Resurrection
- Human obsessions v. God's ways
This is a common--and wrongheaded--human response to the tragedies of others. It no doubt stems in part for our very human desire to make sense of things. But not everything that happens in our fallen world "makes sense." Our alienation from God, a condition the Bible calls sin, means that inexplicable things happen in our world. Bad things do happen to all people.
Job doesn't exempt God from blame either. That's okay. As I often tell people who confide that they sometimes get mad at God, only people who believe that God is real, present, and caring get angry with Him. If we didn't believe in God's existence, we wouldn't be angry with Him. The Psalms are replete with examples of people shaking their fist at or bellyaching to God.
We get angry at the tragedies of life because, deep in our DNA, we know that tragedy and death were never meant to be part of the human experience. See here for a discussion of these issues.
Looking back to vv. 19-22, just before this lesson, we see that Job is not only wearied by grief, pain, and his sudden poverty, he also feels persecuted by his friends. He feels that both God and the world are against him. Throughout that section just before our lesson for this week, Job makes references to his flesh, saying that his bones are clinging to his flesh and that he has escaped death himself by the skin of his teeth, wondering why his friends, "like God, are never satisfied with my flesh?" All of this lay in Job's triumphant affirmation of the resurrection of all who believe in the God revealed, first to Israel, and definitively, in Jesus Christ:
For I know that my Redeemer lives,4. In the 2 Thessalonians passage, the apostle Paul confronts the tendency of the Christians in the Greek city of Thessalonica, to believe reports that Jesus had already returned. Paul asserts that Jesus, God in the flesh, did in fact rise from the dead and that through His resurrection and our faith in Him, we too will experience resurrection. Until Jesus does return or until we leave this earth, we are to be faithful in following Him.
and that at the last he will stand upon the earth;
and after my skin has been thus destroyed,
then in my flesh I shall see God...
Paul's words upbraid modern Christians in two different camps:
- Those obsessed with Jesus' return with little thought to actually living in daily repentance and renewal, daily seeking God's help to love God and love neighbor or to make disciples.
- Those who dismiss the reality of Jesus' resurrection and turn their faith into a kind of "feel good" elixir for their troubles. To them, Paul would say, as he did to the church at Corinth, "If for this life only we have hoped in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied" (1 Corinthians 15:19).
Jesus, in fact, had more in common with the Pharisees than with the Sadducees. The Pharisees, although guilty of legalism that obscured the grace and love of God, believed, like Jesus, in a resurrection and that the entire Old Testament was the Word of God.
The Sadducees repudiated the entire notion of a resurrection and believed that only the first five books of the Old Testament, which make up what the scholars refer to as the Pentateuch, were "canonical." (See point 6, here.) The Pentateuch was also called "the books of Moses."
This is why Jesus reference to Moses toward the end of our lesson is so clever, claiming, as He does, that Moses affirmed the reality of the resurrection by referring to the Lord as "the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob."
6. The "question" of the Sadducees is really designed to trip Jesus up, anger Him, or ridicule Him. The fictional case study they present to Jesus is rooted in what's called "levirate law." (The word levir is a Latin term, meaning husband's brother.) In most circumstances, it was considered wrong for a woman to marry her husband. (See Leviticus 18:16; 20:21) There were several apparent purposes behind levirate marriage: to maintain the continuation of a family line and to protect women who otherwise were without rights. The refusal of brothers to fulfill their duty under this law, while momentarily embarrassing to the man (check out Deuteronomy 25:5-10, linked below) had an even graver consequence. Women widowed without heirs were often forced into a life of prostitution.
But if a woman was widowed and childless and a brother of her late husband is unmarried, it was his duty to marry the widow. Their first male child--only males had property rights, would be considered the heir of the deceased husband. Levirate marriage is discussed in Genesis 38:8 and Deuteronomy 25:5-10.
7. The Sadducees, more concerned with religious propriety than with faith in God, were also obsessed with money, being members of the wealthiest classes. For them, "this life" was all there was. So, their "question" springs directly from their beliefs.
8. Jesus responds in two different ways to the Sadducees, as pointed out by Fred Craddock:
- a. In vv. 34-36, Jesus answers with reason. In the resurrected state, all of what Martin Luther would call "emergency" measures, things like marriage and governments and such, will go by the board. Nobody will be widowed or orphaned. All will have God as Father and, as the New Testament puts it occasionally, husband. It isn't that we won't know or love those with whom we've shared this life. It's just that the old measures will be both unnecessary and defunct.
- b. In vv. 37-38, Jesus responds by alluding to Scripture. As pointed out above, He does so very cleverly, invoking the faith of the very person the Sadducees claimed to be the author of the only books they deemed holy, Moses.
No comments:
Post a Comment